ПалеоДНК жужаней

[asan-kaygy]

В 22.04.2018 в 20:34 кылышбай написал:

 

ПалеоДНК по жужаням

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ajpa.23491

The genome of an ancient Rouran individual reveals an important paternal lineage in the Donghu population

Jiawei Li, Ye Zhang, Yongbin Zhao, Yongzhi Chen, A. Ochir, Sarenbilige, Hong Zhu, Hui Zhou

First published: 21 April 2018
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23491

Abstract

Objectives

Following the Xiongnu and Xianbei, the Rouran Khaganate (Rouran) was the third great nomadic tribe on the Mongolian Steppe. However, few human remains from this tribe are available for archaeologists and geneticists to study, as traces of the tombs of these nomadic people have rarely been found. In 2014, the IA‐M1 remains (TL1) at the Khermen Tal site from the Rouran period were found by a Sino‐Mongolian joint archaeological team in Mongolia, providing precious material for research into the genetic imprint of the Rouran.

Materials and methods

The mtDNA hypervariable sequence I (HVS‐I) and Y‐chromosome SNPs were analyzed, and capture of the paternal non‐recombining region of the Y chromosome (NRY) and whole‐genome shotgun sequencing of TL1 were performed. The materials from three sites representing the three ancient nationalities (Donghu, Xianbei, and Shiwei) were selected for comparison with the TL1 individual.

Results

The mitochondrial haplotype of the TL1 individual was D4b1a2a1. The Y‐chromosome haplotype was C2b1a1b/F3830 (ISOGG 2015), which was the same as that of the other two ancient male nomadic samples (ZHS5 and GG3) related to the Xianbei and Shiwei, which were also detected as F3889; this haplotype was reported to be downstream of F3830 by Wei et al. (2017).

Discussion

We conclude that F3889 downstream of F3830 is an important paternal lineage of the ancient Donghu nomads. The Donghu‐Xianbei branch is expected to have made an important paternal genetic contribution to Rouran. This component of gene flow ultimately entered the gene pool of modern Mongolic‐ and Manchu‐speaking populations.

[Курсант]

1 час назад asan-kaygy написал:

 

ПалеоДНК по жужаням

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ajpa.23491

The genome of an ancient Rouran individual reveals an important paternal lineage in the Donghu population

Jiawei Li, Ye Zhang, Yongbin Zhao, Yongzhi Chen, A. Ochir, Sarenbilige, Hong Zhu, Hui Zhou

First published: 21 April 2018
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23491

Abstract

Objectives

Following the Xiongnu and Xianbei, the Rouran Khaganate (Rouran) was the third great nomadic tribe on the Mongolian Steppe. However, few human remains from this tribe are available for archaeologists and geneticists to study, as traces of the tombs of these nomadic people have rarely been found. In 2014, the IA‐M1 remains (TL1) at the Khermen Tal site from the Rouran period were found by a Sino‐Mongolian joint archaeological team in Mongolia, providing precious material for research into the genetic imprint of the Rouran.

Materials and methods

The mtDNA hypervariable sequence I (HVS‐I) and Y‐chromosome SNPs were analyzed, and capture of the paternal non‐recombining region of the Y chromosome (NRY) and whole‐genome shotgun sequencing of TL1 were performed. The materials from three sites representing the three ancient nationalities (Donghu, Xianbei, and Shiwei) were selected for comparison with the TL1 individual.

Results

The mitochondrial haplotype of the TL1 individual was D4b1a2a1. The Y‐chromosome haplotype was C2b1a1b/F3830 (ISOGG 2015), which was the same as that of the other two ancient male nomadic samples (ZHS5 and GG3) related to the Xianbei and Shiwei, which were also detected as F3889; this haplotype was reported to be downstream of F3830 by Wei et al. (2017).

Discussion

We conclude that F3889 downstream of F3830 is an important paternal lineage of the ancient Donghu nomads. The Donghu‐Xianbei branch is expected to have made an important paternal genetic contribution to Rouran. This component of gene flow ultimately entered the gene pool of modern Mongolic‐ and Manchu‐speaking populations.

у них торе-кластер F1756?

[asan-kaygy]

41 минуту назад Shymkent написал:

у них торе-кластер F1756?

У них этот субклад но какой кластер не понятно еще

[asan-kaygy]

2 часа назад asan-kaygy написал:

 

ПалеоДНК по жужаням

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ajpa.23491

The genome of an ancient Rouran individual reveals an important paternal lineage in the Donghu population

Jiawei Li, Ye Zhang, Yongbin Zhao, Yongzhi Chen, A. Ochir, Sarenbilige, Hong Zhu, Hui Zhou

First published: 21 April 2018
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23491

Abstract

Objectives

Following the Xiongnu and Xianbei, the Rouran Khaganate (Rouran) was the third great nomadic tribe on the Mongolian Steppe. However, few human remains from this tribe are available for archaeologists and geneticists to study, as traces of the tombs of these nomadic people have rarely been found. In 2014, the IA‐M1 remains (TL1) at the Khermen Tal site from the Rouran period were found by a Sino‐Mongolian joint archaeological team in Mongolia, providing precious material for research into the genetic imprint of the Rouran.

Materials and methods

The mtDNA hypervariable sequence I (HVS‐I) and Y‐chromosome SNPs were analyzed, and capture of the paternal non‐recombining region of the Y chromosome (NRY) and whole‐genome shotgun sequencing of TL1 were performed. The materials from three sites representing the three ancient nationalities (Donghu, Xianbei, and Shiwei) were selected for comparison with the TL1 individual.

Results

The mitochondrial haplotype of the TL1 individual was D4b1a2a1. The Y‐chromosome haplotype was C2b1a1b/F3830 (ISOGG 2015), which was the same as that of the other two ancient male nomadic samples (ZHS5 and GG3) related to the Xianbei and Shiwei, which were also detected as F3889; this haplotype was reported to be downstream of F3830 by Wei et al. (2017).

Discussion

We conclude that F3889 downstream of F3830 is an important paternal lineage of the ancient Donghu nomads. The Donghu‐Xianbei branch is expected to have made an important paternal genetic contribution to Rouran. This component of gene flow ultimately entered the gene pool of modern Mongolic‐ and Manchu‐speaking populations.

Радиуглеродная датировка указывает на 585-650 годы, явно не жужани.

[Le_Raffine]

18 минут назад asan-kaygy написал:

Радиуглеродная датировка указывает на 585-650 годы, явно не жужани.

Ашина?

[Samtat]

3 часа назад asan-kaygy написал:

ПалеоДНК по жужаням

Сегодня с утра смотрю: "Rouran Khaganate" . Думаю, что ещё такое ? Пока по гуглу не забил, не понял. 

[asan-kaygy]

41 минуту назад Le_Raffine написал:

Ашина?

возможно тюрки

[asan-kaygy]

2 минуты назад Samtat написал:

Сегодня с утра смотрю: "Rouran Khaganate" . Думаю, что ещё такое ? Пока по гуглу не забил, не понял. 

Да, название на английском не совпадает с русским

[Steppe Man]

1 hour ago, asan-kaygy said:

возможно тюрки

Quote

This component of gene flow ultimately entered the gene pool of modern Mongolic‐ and Manchu‐speaking populations.

 

[asan-kaygy]

27 минут назад Steppe Man написал:

 

Обмен генетическим материалом между соседями вполне распространенная явление

[Samtat]

7 часов назад asan-kaygy написал:

Радиуглеродная датировка указывает на 585-650 годы, явно не жужани.

Германская лаборатория датирует 4-6 веком н.э. :

Цитата

The C dating of the wood on the coffin board was confirmed both at Peking University, China (cal. AD590–655) and the University of Cologne, Germany (cal. AD 335–535)(Chen et al., 2015a). The absolute chronology of the tomb ranges from the fourth to sixth centuries AD, which is a time period coinciding with the Rouran Khan Kingdom on the Mongolian Plateau.

 

[reicheOnkel]

17 hours ago, asan-kaygy said:

возможно тюрки

вроде тюрки сжигали своих покойников. как я помню в тюркских захоронениях отсутствуют человеческие останки. есть зола. 

[asan-kaygy]

10 часов назад Samtat написал:

Германская лаборатория датирует 4-6 веком н.э. :

 

Спасибо за подсказку, теперь больше возможности что это жужани, европейцы мне кажется будут более точны. Хотя надо почитать это датиовки останков или чего-то другоо. Те же китайцы датировали останки 

[asan-kaygy]

1 минуту назад asan-kaygy написал:

Спасибо за подсказку, теперь больше возможности что это жужани, европейцы мне кажется будут более точны. Хотя надо почитать это датиовки останков или чего-то другоо. Те же китайцы датировали останки 

Посмотрел wood on the coffin board. Надо детальнее статью прочитать еще раз

[asan-kaygy]

7 минут назад reicheOnkel написал:

вроде тюрки сжигали своих покойников. как я помню в тюркских захоронениях отсутствуют человеческие останки. есть зола. 

Еще один аргумент в пользу жужаней в захоронении

[Rust]

7 часов назад reicheOnkel написал:

вроде тюрки сжигали своих покойников. как я помню в тюркских захоронениях отсутствуют человеческие останки. есть зола. 

Тюрки меняли обряд трупосожжения на трупоположение, как помню при Эль-кагане. Китайский император обвинял их в нарушении традиций.

[ARS]

25.04.2018 в 09:02, reicheOnkel сказал:

вроде тюрки сжигали своих покойников. как я помню в тюркских захоронениях отсутствуют человеческие останки. есть зола. 

тюрки принявших буддизм или  зороастризм сжигали своих покойников , тенгрианцы нет 

[Скриптонит]

Потомки жужаней - ныне среди китайцев и казахов?

https://www.yfull.com/tree/C-F3830/

 

[ARS]

14 минут назад, Скриптонит сказал:

Потомки жужаней - ныне среди китайцев и казахов?

https://www.yfull.com/tree/C-F3830/

 

Питер Фрэнсис Миддлтон р. 1920 и р. 2010

Великобритания

C-Y148084

и среди англичан ?